8 Elements of Fly Design to Follow for Imitating Trout Food Sources

15 comments / Posted on / by

DSC_2245

Gray drake living on the edge. Photo by: Louis Cahill

When tying fly patterns, it’s very important that you try your best to incorporate several different elements of fly design to increase their effectiveness.

No one knows with complete certainty what order or priority trout rank each element of a food source or fly pattern, but most anglers agree that the value or ranking of the elements often change depending on how long a trout has been selectively feeding on a specific food source, at what frequency the specific food source is being eaten, and how diverse or consistent a trout’s diet is at the present moment. The order of the elements that I will talk about in know way ranks the importance of the elements. Instead, fly tiers should look at them together as a whole, and try to include as many as possible or as a check list of the features a fly pattern should have when completed. Doing so, they should find there fly patterns more effective on the water for fooling and catching trout. In this post, I will specifically talk about eight different elements of fly design that fly tiers should pay close attention to when tying fly patterns at the vise.

mayfly-nymph

Photo By: Jan Hamrsky – www.aquaticinsect.net

1 & 2. Size (body) & Shape (Outline)

All trout food sources have a distinguishable main body that’s easy for trout to spot. When fly tiers have finished tying a fly it should only take a fraction of a second for the tier to be able to distinguish where the main body (abdomen & thorax) of the fly is located and if it’s tied in the correct proportion to the size of the hook. If multiple elements of a fly pattern end up mixing together or aren’t clearly defined by the eye, you’re pattern will often be rejected by trout because they won’t be able to easily recognize the different areas of the fly and relate them to the naturals (tail, body, thorax, head). A sign of this happening is when you’re fishing a pattern you’ve tied and it never seems to be hot. Take for example, the occasional twig that floats downstream. Trout rarely pay much attention to them because most of them are uniform in look and shape and therefore lack enough positive life-like features or action to resemble food. They have the attitude if they’ve test one twig, they’ve tested them all. Anglers should always tie or purchase fly patterns in multiple sizes. Quite often you’re fishing the right pattern, but it’s just too big or small, usually too big.

One of the first rules I learned in fly tying from my instructors was my flies needed to have the proper shape. My instructors made sure that I tied each part of the fly pattern in proper proportions and used a graduating taper moving towards the eye of the hook. The golden rule was beat into me if you get the body and thorax wrong on the fly, you’re finished fly will be crap. That’s because the main body of an insect (comprises the largest percentage of the flies size) and it’s the first thing a trout focuses in on when they see your fly pattern. If you look at the bodies of aquatic insects you’ll notice that they almost always have a noticeable degree of increasing taper from the tail to the head. Trout understand this and it’s an element that they use when deciding whether the object they’re looking at is food or not food. To get that nice taper, it requires you to slow down at the vise, but doing so, it will significantly increase the effectiveness of the fly patterns you tie. One tip I’ve found when dubbing a nice tapered body is to use sparse amounts of tying materials and to take your time. Don’t try to dub the entire body with one large amount of dubbing in one shot. As you get more proficient at tying you’ll find it easier to get a smooth taper and it will only take a fraction of the time.

transparent-midge

Photo by: Scott Hogsten – www.thatbugguy.com

3. Translucency

Take a close look at aquatic insects and you’ll quickly notice that the majority of them have a significant degree of translucency in the bodies. Trout often see transparency in food prospects as a positive element in their food sources. When tying flies you should make a point to try to tie your flies with some degree of translucency. A good way to accomplish this is by mixing different colors of dubbing and tying it sparsely on the hook. You can use stretchy synthetic ribbing (ex. v-ribbing) or shellback materials that are somewhat transparent out of the package. A subtle degree of translucency will give your flies depth and a natural look that other non-food floating debris in the current will not carry. Remember you can tie in lighter colored materials that are translucent and then use a darker sharpie marker over the top of them to get that multi-color and transparent look.

aquatic-insects

Photo by Jan Hamrsky – www.aquaticinsect.net

4. Appendages (wings, legs, tails)

Although there’s a small percentage of trout food sources that don’t really have dominant appendages (antennae, legs, gills, wings, tails) most do. So when you’re tying flies, you should alway make sure you’re doing a good job of adding appendage like features into your patterns when it’s called for. It’s not terribly important that your patterns always have the exact number of appendages of the naturals the trout are eating and you don’t need to go overboard and tie three times as many thinking more is better. Aquatic insects are very fragile and they’re constantly getting preyed upon and banged up by turbulent water flow.

Quite often, if you take the time to do some bug sampling, you’ll find aquatic insects with missing legs or tails. All that really matters is that the pattern carries that overall impressionistic look of the bug you’re imitating. That’s usually enough for the trout to get the positive signals they need to eat your fly. That being said, there are rare occasions when trout will become super sensitive to the number or size of the appendages on bugs. An example of this would be when trout have been feeding on a specific food source for an extended period or when they’re selectiely feeding on a specific stage of bug (cripple, emerger, spinner). Here, trout may use the size of the wing or length of the tails as positive triggers.

drake-mayfly

Photo by: Scott Hogsten – www.thatbugguy.com

5. Texture

Have you ever wondered why your smooth fly patterns often catch less fish than your really textured and buggy looking fly patterns? Again, if you examine the aquatic bugs that trout feed on they almost always have distinctive segmentation in the bodies and a multi-colored (molted) buggy look throughout. I’ve had a super realistic stonefly nymph in one of my fly boxes for years. If you put one next to a natural you’d have to really stare closely at the two of them to point out the artificial. The problem I have with that particular realistic stonefly pattern is I’ve fished it more times than I can count and I’ve never caught a trout on it.

Now, if I dropped that realistic stonefly in your hand and let you touch and feel the texture of it, you’s say it was hard as hell, stiff as a board, and you’d quickly tell me, I wouldn’t eat that thing if I was a trout. The damn antennae and tails on this fly are so hard and stiff, you could puncture the hind end of a cow with it. Texture, though not as important in my opinion as other elements in fly design, can drastically have a positive or negative effect on how many trout it will fool. Choosing materials that not only look realistic but also have the correct feel, softness or rigidy to the touch is something fly tiers should really think about when tying flies at the vise. Remember, trout don’t always inhale your fly patterns. Especially when you’re using subsurface patterns. Underwater trout often test or nip your fly, testing it for danger, to smell and taste it. If your pattern is way off the mark with texture trout will undoubtedly spit the fly out most of the time before you can set the hook.

fly-tying-trout-patterns

Photo by Jan Hamrsky – www.aquaticinsect.net

6. Color

I’ve heard anglers many times over the years claiming fly color can be the most important element in fly design when trout fishing. In some instances, it’s true it can be extremely important for getting trout to eat a fly pattern. For example, when there’s a good amount of visible light and you’re fishing crystal clear water or when wild trout are super keyed in on a specific type or stage of an aquatic insect.

Another time color is really important is when an angler is fishing really flat slow moving water to super educated trout. Trout feeding in calm, slow moving water often have as much as two to three times the length of time to examine your offering and they often get within inches of it before giving you the “yeh or neh”. Many times I’ve got refused by one pattern I tied after a dozen or more good presentations, then switched to the same pattern but one I tied with a slightly different color dubbing and I caught the trout on the first cast. It’s hard to argue the importance of color when you see that situation first hand.

That being said, when fly anglers are fishing in low light situations, fast moving water, infertile trout waters with low bug densities or in murky water conditions, exact color or pattern becomes much less important and trout tend to be much more forgiving with color, choosing instead to weigh their decision whether to eat or not eat your fly by looking for positive triggers in the other five elements of fly design.

7. Ultraviolet Reflectance & Ultraviolet ABSORPTION

In the past couple of years I’ve really made a point to utilize fly tying materials in my fly pattern designs that provide strategic ultraviolet reflectance and ultraviolet absorption properties. Just about all aquatic insects have unique ultraviolet markings (these marking provide invisible highlights and dark spots only visible in UV). The insects use these signature markings to distinguish themselves from other species and it helps them to mate more effectively without calling attention to predators that prey upon them. Trout use their ultraviolet vision when there’s not enough visible light (ex. low light conditions or dirty water). By adding subtle amounts of UVR and UVA tying materials in your fly designs you can increase the attraction, the distance a trout can see your flies in the water and make your flies look more like the real thing (when trout view them in UV of course).

Many synthetic materials provide a better scattered UVR than natural materials. Davy Wotton’s SLF dubbing and Spirit Rivers UV dubbing are two examples of tying materials that will help you increase the UVR in your flies. Ultraviolet absorption is more about color choice. If you read the book, The New Scientific Angling by Reed F. Curry, it provides tons of color tables that show you what the color of certain types of tying materials look like in the ultraviolet light spectrum. For the most part the darker the color the higher the UVA will be. But it’s not always true. I used to think your standard yellow color would show up bright in ultraviolet light just like it does in visible light, but that’s not the case. Yellow in ultraviolet light shows up really dark, almost black. I recommend that you tie your pattern with contrasting colors and textured materials so you can benefit from the UVR and UVA it provides under ultraviolet light. More particularly, you should fish those patterns when you think the conditions on the water suggest trout are being more reliant on their ultraviolet vision.

One reason almost all nymph patterns call for a ribbing material (often colored wire, tinsel or natural biots) is because it does a great job of providing that realistic segmentation look of the bodies of aquatic insects. This segmentation is easy to see in visible light, but it really pops out twice as much when trout view it with their ultraviolet vision. Always make a point to use fly tying materials that add a nice segmentation look to the bodies of your flies because it’s sort of like the finger prints of aquatic bugs. Smooth flies catch far less fish. I could go into another couple thousands words on this subject. I just skimmed it and I probably did a poor job. If you want to learn more about trout and their ultraviolet vision and why its important in fly fishing and fly tying, pick up one of the latest books on this subject.

MayFlyNymph

Photo by: Scott Hogsten – www.thatbugguy.com

8. Action

Drop a nymph or adult aquatic insect that’s alive in a glass of water and it most often will not be motionless. Most of the time the insects will kick, flap and swim with their legs and tails vigorously. What this suggests to fly tiers is that your patterns should be tied with materials that breath and move freely in the water. Doing so, you’re patterns will naturally have life-like action in the water and will provide positive stimulation to trout that they are real food and not impostors. Some would say action is only important in subsurface patterns, but the fact is, that couldn’t be farther from the truth. If you believe that, explain to me why there’s so many dry flies patterns tied with rubber legs. My good friend and guide Brian Lynch ties all his flies on with a non-slip loop knot to improve the action of his fly on and below the surface. I highly recommend this.

Thank you to Scott Hogsten from www.thatbugguy.com and Jan Hamrsky from www.aquaticinsect.net for both graciously allowing us to use their photography in this post. Both are passionate about photographing insects in the macro and are extremely talented. In addition, both websites are great places to check out if you want to get a better look at examples of trout foods up close. Please visit their websites and show your support. Scott had mentioned he was going to be doing some fresh aquatic insect shots shortly and would give us a heads up.

Keep it Reel,

Come fish with us in the Bahamas!

Kent Klewein
Gink & Gasoline
www.ginkandgasoline.com
hookups@ginkandgasoline.com
 
Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter!
 

Follow Gink & Gasoline on Facebook:

15 thoughts on “8 Elements of Fly Design to Follow for Imitating Trout Food Sources

  1. Thanks for another thorough article.
    On the subject of texture: I wonder whether there are not two aspects to texture that we are trying to address at once here. I have often mulled over the idea, that so many of our flies are a rough and fuzzy texture (dubbing), whereas so many of the naturals, while they do have appendages, are in fact “exoskeletal” in nature. In other words the body or thorax plates are smooth, and not as we create them, with fluffy material.

    Sure, they are not as hard as eggshell, (and I would suggest that is the second aspect to the issue of texture), but they are smooth.

    I do acknowledge that our fluffy dubbed flies work a treat, but I have a selection of smoother patterns at the ready too, and often ponder if this trigger is important at certain times, or with certain insects?

    • Andrew,

      Thanks for that thoughtful question and also your personal input on the subject. Yes, I believe one could argue there are two aspects of texture.

      I will say that if you observe aquatic insects in the water alive, most of them move fluently in the water and that action is what I think we try to imitate with our fluffy tying materials that breath well in the water. Furthermore, the majority of aquatic insects that trout eat are very fragile and reasonably soft to the touch.

      I’ll provide a quote from the great Dave Whitlock about texture who said,”Each natural food has a particular identifiable texture or feel when touched or bitten by a trout. So an imitation of such foods should have the same general feel. The tying material considered or used for an imitation should be chosen with the same feel or texture of the natural. Very hard or very soft imitations seldom fall into the realistic texture range.”

      Kent

  2. Excellent article! It focuses on the Why and not so much on the What and How. I like approaching fly design as a problem solving process and these are great parameters to work within.
    Mahalo!

    • Reed,

      It’s an honor to hear from you. Your Book, The New Scientific Angling rocks man, and it’s changed the way I think about fly tying in many ways. Thanks for the comment and checking out G&G.

      Kent

  3. Great article!

    This article has many of the aspects I learned about what makes a fly a good fly.
    This is also why I wonder why the Czech and Polish nymphs are so effective…

  4. Great article, guys. I was really interested to see your opinions on texture of flies as I’ve wondered about this for a number of years now. So many recent underwater videos of fish and how they actually interact with our flies have shown how many times fish actually eat our flies and spit them out without us ever realizing it. This has me wondering what makes fish hang onto certain flies and spit others out and I have theorized that texture may have a lot to do with it. I’ve often heard that putting rubber legs on a nymph will increase its effectiveness and have wondered if its not the added sensation of ‘feeling’ the legs in their mouth rather than ‘seeing’ the legs that makes the difference. Of course all this texture theory may run out of steam when you see how well flies like John Barr’s Copper John work and it’s mostly wire and epoxy! Oh, well I suppose that’s what makes it interesting.
    Keep up the great writing!

    • Jed,

      Thanks for the great comment. As I said in the article, the importance of the elements regularly change depending on the day and mood of the trout. Its up to the angler to figure out key triggers each day on the water. I hear you loud and clear on the copper john though and agree that it’s texture doesn’t seem like it would score all that well for trout. It is a hard fly. One of key reasons I think it works so well is that it’s a sparse tie and the weight sinks it into the strike zone very quickly. Which means it stays in the strike zone longer per drift than most subsurface fly patterns.

      Kent

  5. Very thought provoking article. Thanks! Of course for any rule or guideline there are countless exceptions and that keeps the game interesting. For example, on some days the answer is a Comparadun, which of course has nothing suggesting legs or appendages. Mayflies DO have legs, so why does this work? I have no idea; but I submit that if we understood everything this fly fishing we do would no longer be as much fun.
    Texture is something I hadn’t really thought much about with Trout flies. I know if makes a difference when Bass fishing using topwaters. A foam or even better yet a deer hair bug will be held longer than plastic or cork will. In fact you can’t wait very long to set the hook with a deer hair bug as they try and swallow it.
    Finally I think circumstances on the stream have a dramatic effect on the effectiveness of a fly. The more time a trout has to get a really good look at a fly, the better that fly has to be (see above!). On dark days with rough water and non-selective fish it is much less critical. Hence “good fishing days” and “bad fishing days”. Thanks again for a good read.

  6. Great work Kent. I agree with just about all your observations and suggestions. One thing about fly fishing: You can learn more every day and still have so much more information to master…

    I also like non-slip loop knots on my nymphs, wet flies, and streamers, especially when I am overmatching tippet, like 5x on a size 18 or 20 fly. It seems to work for me. Of course I learned to use the knot in salt water fly fishing trying to get more action on my redfish and snook flies.

  7. Pingback: 8 Elements of Fly Design for Imitating Trout Food Sources | Ask A Fly Fishing Guide

  8. Pingback: What Trout Eat and How to Imitate It | Line & Sight

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>